Monday, December 17, 2007

Michael Savage fights where Imus fled

I'm glad Savage isn't backing down to CAIR's calls for boycotts of his advertisers. I see the New York Socialist Times picked up the story:

    The humbling of Don Imus last spring over his remarks about the Rutgers women’s basketball team has done nothing to quiet Michael Savage, a radio host with a far bigger following and far more checkered track record.

    Mr. Savage, whose program reaches an estimated eight million listeners a week on nearly 400 stations, suggested over the summer that a group of college students on a hunger strike in support of easing immigration restrictions should “fast until they starve to death.” In October the Board of Supervisors of San Francisco, the city from which Mr. Savage often broadcasts, took the unusual step of passing a resolution condemning him for the remarks.

    Then, a few weeks ago, Mr. Savage uncorked a cascade of invective about Islam. Among his on-air comments: the Koran is “a book of hate”; some Muslims, at least, “need deportation”; and adherents of Islam would do well to “take your religion and shove it up your behind” because “I’m sick of you.”

    In response the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose stated mission includes correcting mischaracterizations of Islam, tore a page from the playbook of Mr. Imus’s critics. It made Mr. Savage’s comments widely available on the Internet and called on advertisers to boycott his program, which is behind only Rush Limbaugh’s and Sean Hannity’s in number of listeners, according to Talkers magazine, an industry publication.

Savage's response to the boycott:

    On Dec. 3 Mr. Savage fired back at his critics in a way Mr. Imus never did: He filed a lawsuit in United States District Court against the council, not only for taking his comments out of context — he says they were made within a broader discussion of the president of Iran — but for then making audio of them available on its Web site, cair.com.

Here's an interesting look at Savage:

    Mr. Savage agreed last week to allow a reporter to sit in on his program, but only on the condition that the reporter not reveal the location of the waterside house where he was broadcasting that day, or of two other homes where he has studios and which he treats as virtual safe houses. Mr. Savage, who is licensed to carry a pistol and does so, said the secrecy was warranted by his fears for his life, based on the sheaf of death threats he says he has received over the years.

    Mr. Savage can be surprisingly unintimidating in person, standing 5-foot-7 and looking, on this day, like he had sprung from an L. L. Bean catalog in a bright orange corduroy shirt, black fleece vest and tan chinos, with a miniature poodle at his feet. He can also project charm, insisting that a visitor just off a cross-country flight pause to have a turkey sandwich with potato salad.

    [...]

    He readily acknowledged, though, that during his 20s and 30s he was “super left-wing,” including the times he worked as a welfare worker on the Upper West Side of Manhattan and later as a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley, where he earned a Ph.D. in nutritional ethnomedicine.

    But he turned sharply to the right after, among other things, finding that his welfare clients were often living better than he, and that despite a Ph.D. he couldn’t get a college teaching job after five years of trying. “I was the wrong race,” he said. “I was the wrong sex.”

13 comments:

The Shaved Ape said...

Your comment is either spam or a joke, but I'll play along anyway. I have no intention of helping reform a Dark Age cult. That's a Muslim job.

Also, I'm not convinced there are any Muslims against terror, as I haven't been moved by the few written statements posted on Muslim websites condemning 9/11. There has been a total of one Islamic fatwa issued against Osama bin Laden (and that didn't come until years after), while millions (literally) of Muslims support the death of a writer named Rushdie after a fatwa was issued.

When Hitler rose to power, American Nazis formed The Bund. Wherever The Bund rallied, German-Americans counter-rallied -- in the streets, with picket signs denouncing Hitler, Nazis, and German aggression.

Where are the Muslim rallies against terrorism? The only conclusion one can make, after thousands of terror attacks committed by Muslims in the last 40 years is that the general view of terrorism in the Muslim community
is that it's not so bad.

In contrast to the German-Americans during WWII, the only people Muslims are denouncing in America are people critical of Muslims and terrorism.

Instead of telling me to "start helping" reform Islam, why don't you just be quiet.

The Shaved Ape said...

I've just reviewed the blog Muslims Against Sharia. It looks promising, and may even be a step in the right direction -- I'll have to read more before deciding on that.

Still, I'm not interested in "helping" reform what I consider a Dark Age cult (Islam). This a free country, so Muslims have the right to call their cult a religion and practice it, but I'm very skeptical if there will ever be meaningful reform. There is no central authority within Islam with which to institute reforms, which would greatly help with a reformist cause.

It may be better to follow the example of Christianity, a religion that was just as bloodthirsty as Islam prior to its own reformation. Their change from barbarism to moderation came not from a re-writing of the Bible(s), but from splinter groups forming and gaining strength. Why not start a new offshoot of Islam, using a new (reformed) Koran?

http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/

koran-AT-reformislam.org

Anonymous said...

"Where are the Muslim rallies against terrorism?"

"why don't you just be quiet"

So, first you're bitching about lack of Muslim rallies against terrorist, which is not true, by the way, and then you tell me to be quiet? I must be not that bright, because I don't understand which way should I go; rally against terrorism or be quiet?

The Shaved Ape said...

I apologize for my lack of clarity:

1) Be quiet about enlisting me in your efforts to reform a Dark Age cult.

2) Then go rally against terrorism.

Thank you very much.

Anonymous said...

Fair enough. WE will do that as soon as YOU stop financing terrorism.

The Shaved Ape said...

"WE" as in Muslims first, Americans second, right? "WE" applies to Americans in this country. Anyone who doesn't agree should leave.

For the record, I don't vote for any political party that gives my money to terrorists. Here's one of five posts on the subject:

http://theshavedape.blogspot.com/2007/12/money-for-terror.html

Anonymous said...

So, your "be quiet" request was to an American? Not too friendly with logic, are we?

The Shaved Ape said...

You're a fiery one, aren't ya? I'm trying to think of another way to insult you, but I'm out of ideas.

How about this: You're a dumbass.

Anonymous said...

You must be projecting. Are you sure that you are shaved?

The Shaved Ape said...

Only my #&@^! is shaved. Thanks for asking.

Anonymous said...

You must really love you boyfriend to go the extra mile.

Anonymous said...

Jeebers!

The Shaved Ape said...

Yeah, this is getting out of hand. I'm going to fall back on a classic:

"muslims against sharlia" is a sissy.