Friday, February 08, 2013

Leftist nutjob terrorizes Southern California

Remember when Jared Loughner opened fire on a crowd in Arizona a couple of years ago? With no information, the leftist press (that's 85%, coast to coast) blamed right-wing talk radio, as did leftist politicians. I kept waiting for the proof to follow the claims. No proof came because there never was any proof. Leftists created a myth (actually, it's a lie, because myths generally have a kernel of truth). Loughner wasn't right-wing and never listened to talk radio of any variety.

Now the media is becoming fascinated by Chris Dorner, a former LAPD cop now hunting other LAPD cops, just as they hunt him. Once again, the media is lying about a shooter. With Loughner it was the lie that he was right-winger, now it's the lie by omission -- Dorner is a leftist nutjob.

For the second time, I've read the manifesto of a madman (the first was The Unabomber). Dorner praises Chris Matthews, among other weirdo left-wingers:
    Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough, Pat Harvey, Brian Williams, Soledad Obrien, Wolf Blitzer, Meredith Viera, Tavis Smiley, and Anderson Cooper, keep up the great work and follow Cronkite’s lead. I hold many of you in the same regard as Tom Brokaw and the late Peter Jennings. Cooper, stop nagging and berating your guest, they’re your (guest). Mr. Scarborough, we met at McGuire’s pub in P-cola in 2002 when I was stationed there. It was an honor conversing with you about politics, family, and life.
Good luck finding any objective journalism on Dorner. It's beyond incredible that whenever somebody with right-wing views goes off the deep end, the press makes sure everybody knows it, 24/7 for weeks on end. When a left-winger goes off, well, politics isn't important. Anything to push a cause, I suppose.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

leftist or rightist, the guy's a nut. leftist or rightist, media sources that misrepresent facts should be ignored. why complain whether poor-quality reporting leans one direction or another? maybe a better alternative would be to gather research on the facts of a case, or to find a reputable source for information that has earned your dispassionate trust, then share that. however, by calling out a perceived bias in one direction, you risk joining the fray. after all, if a marxist paper touts their naïve world view in contrast to the embarrassing commentary of Glenn Beck or Fox news, would they be more correct? hell no!